hi davew sorry if you have taken my comments as offensive as that is not what i was trying to put forward , so i apologize for that, sorry.
my point is that their is another side to this story and it's not being heard because they say the science is in and you should just believe it, no sorry im not going to believe a computer generated concept, that is simply not real , it's a concept , a possible maybe at best . the info that you put forward is just that , a scientist put an algorithm into a computer and came up with a concept that under certain circumstances and the wind blows up instead off down this is a possibility and because scientists are scientists they agree that under those circumstances its a possibility, this was evident in the first 3 words of the reply ( a science consensus) sorry davew but i only deal with whats real , i have learnt over the years to question everything and to not accept the norm
my real opinion is that the carbon debate is a rouse to distract the people from the real issues that are staring the powers to be in the face ,pollution, population, plastics, politicians etc. these are today's real issues not carbon . no amount of carbon is ever going to hurt any human or animal ever( unless a tree falls on them, unlucky)so im sorry davew that i dont agree with your concepts and that the science is not their . i live on an island and if the water was rising it would be a visual thing by now , it's supose to be a meter or so higher according to the computer modeling , sorry davew im just not seeing it
while i accept that people have differing views i don't accept that their is only one side to this issue.
PS back to the real question , do you still have your Range Rover . it's ok to yes , it's old and recycled so its ok to have one in my opinion.