Mine do as well, makes changing the rear shocks dead easy. Be interested to hear what you think of the terrafirmas, some people have said they make the ride quite harsh which is why I stuck with original Boge.
From the picture it looks like there's a brass thing screwed in that the temperature sensor would push into. If you unscrew that does it leave the correct size threaded hole? The lack of male to male pipe to connect the inlet filter solenoid is a bit of a problem though but I suspect they expect you to mount the solenoid remotely and connect the two with a short length of copper pipe with nuts and olives on each end.
Ray recently found that his desiccant had turned to concrete (https://rangerovers.pub/topic/709?page=2) and was restricting the flow, maybe yours is the same?
Give them a bell, they are very friendly and don't bite. What you have doesn't look like any of the other Tomasetto reducers shown on their site, in fact, as you say, it does look very much like a Zavoli. Maybe just a bit of badge engineering or the two companies have become one.
On every one I've tried to remove, the nut has rusted so much that you can't get a socket to grip on it. When you do get something to grip (Irwin grip in my case) the whole thing rotates and chews up, or rips off, the plastic mounting lug. Admittedly I've never had to touch a front one it's always been rears that I've need to change. Maybe they are more exposed so rust quicker?
Assuming you can get them off without resorting to an angle grinder.......
Glad to be able to help. Not sure how they can be cheaper but they do seen to be across the board. I even checked my bike insurance and although that was only a couple of quid cheaper, it was still cheaper than I am paying. Being an old codger, the bike is insured with Saga!
Orangebean wrote:
Third party only quotes were on average £200 more than that. WTF?
I noticed the same thing so Googled to see why
https://www.moneysupermarket.com/press-releases/motor-myth-busted-fully-comp-cheaper-than-third-party-only/
Not sure if anyone else has tried it but mustard.co.uk seems to give lower quotes that any of the other comparison sites. The best quote I got for a Classic policy for my Maserati last year was £147 a year but mustard quoted me £83. Dina's daughter recently bought a car, a Nissan Micra but the 1.6 Sport model (as it was a nice colour and looked cute, not the sort of criteria we would use to buy a car but there you go) and the best quote on goCompare was over 3 grand for a 22 year old learner. Mustard gave the same cover, with a company that you've heard of (Hastings) for £830.
On a Thor I think there are O rings where the metal pipes attach to the block and inlet manifold but not where the hoses connect to the pipes. So if you are just replacing the hoses, no need to worry. When I've got new ones to fit, rather than pulling and heaving on the old hoses to get them off, I just slit them lengthwise with a Stanley knife so they come off easily.
The whole coolant flow doesn't go through the reducer and heater, only that in the heater circuit. The heater circuit is the only place it flows through when started from cold and it's only when the stat opens does it go through the radiator as well. Removing as many joins as possible is always a good idea, every join is a potential leak point. So best to replace hose 22, the return from the heater after you have taken the Tee out of it. Obviously you need to have joins in the flow side as you have to reduce the hose size from 19mm down to 16mm and back again, but if you use decent quality (ideally metal) reducers and new hose, you shouldn't have a problem.
I wouldn't bypass the throttle body heater, especially not at this time of the year. Ideal conditions for carburettor or throttle body icing are high humidity and a temperature slightly above freezing. The airflow through the venturi accelerates and cools so the damp in the air freezes in the venturi coating the inside of the venturi and throttle plate with ice. In the old days cars used to have a swivelling intake on the air filter and the winter position would draw warmed air in from next to the exhaust manifold. Many years ago I ran a car that had been fitted with pancake filters and got so used to it icing I used to boil a kettle and put it in the car before setting off for work. After about half a mile the car would go ridiculously rich and splutter to a halt so I'd pour the contents of the kettle over the carbs to melt the ice that had formed inside them. When I went out to the Ascot this morning it was covered in condensation and the HEVAC said it was 3 degrees outside, perfect icing conditions without a throttle body heater.
I changed the plumbing on the Ascot to series but although I'd got full flow, the heater was doing odd things. After glueing the dash top down a couple of days ago I ran the engine with the Prog button in (but heated screens switched off) to warm up the glue and help it set. Although it started off hot, after leaving the engine idling for around 20 minutes, the heater was barely lukewarm. So this morning, having seen you'd improved your heater by backflushing the matrix, I pulled the two pipes and did the same. Something resembling tomato soup came out..... Having put it back together, used it a little while ago and the heater is now working exactly as it should.
Yes that's right, in hose 21 (and not 22 as I think I said before). So it';s manifold, reducer, heater and then the return as it was intended. No Tees, but you'll need 19-16mm reducers in the hoses but the restriction is not noticeable..
I don't think you'd want to use anything like that for absolute measurements but to watch a varying voltage or resistance on blend motors, lambda sensors and the like, they can't be beaten (other than by a scope......).
No they're not. The one on the right hiding in the gloom looked to be an early AVO but not with a wooden case and single scale. My 8 still gets used occasionally, there are times when you can't beat a big moving needle over a digital display.
Is that an AVO6 you've got there? I've got a 7 and 8, but that looks older than both of them?
It will and it still will after you've turned off passive immobilisation. The idea is that if you do accidentally press the fob button when in your pocket and unlock the car, it realises you didn't mean to do it and locks itself again. I don't think you can kill that feature.
There's 3 options if that is the problem, re-weld it (not easy as it's a pretty hefty lump and the oil inside it could catch fire), replace it (not cheap) or see where the porous section or crack in the weld is, drill it out, tap it and put a screw coated in Loctite in the tapped hole. The third method was used successfully on a Classic Range Rover that had the same problem on the rear axle.
EKA in the door would have worked. The fob won't sync while in that state. I used to get it all the time until I disabled passive immobilisation if I didn't start the car within 30 seconds of unlocking it.
Front brake lines don't run anywhere near the diff so unlikely. I'd say diff oil, the modern stuff is almost clear, especially if you used the synthetic which doesn't smell like the mineral based stuff does. It hardly smells at all. It doesn't get dirty either but stays looking like it did when you put it in, there's no combustion or anything there to dirty it. Clean it off with a blast of brake cleaner so you're starting with a clean and dry diff. It'll be either the pinion oil seal or a porous section in the weld in the actual casing.